Our Captains and their Decisions

Earlier this year, when Australia landed in India for the one day series (immediately after our Twenty20 triumph), Dhoni had to choose between Harbhajan and Powar for a spot in the playing eleven. Powar had been a consistent presence in the side through the tour of Ireland and England and had done really well. In fact, Powar and Chawla tossing the ball higher and higher during the middle overs of the one dayers with a fair bit of success is a romantic memory that lingers from the past year.

Harbhajan, on the other hand, had been dropped after the ODI World Cup and was making a comeback into the ODI side based on good performance in the Twenty20 competition. One can't really take away the success he had during that tournament, but anyone that watched his bowling, would know that it was success based on consistent flat blockhole or thereabouts bowling rather than flight based deception. In fact, he did not seem to have much else to offer. When Misbah moved deeper into the crease and went after him in the finals, Harbhajan could not do much. Still, overall, he was a success story from that triumph.

Coming back to the Ind-Aus ODI series, Cricinfo ran a preview, in which, it was stated as a given that Harbhajan would be preferred over Powar. It took be by surprise, but I grudgingly accepted that that was a reality of Indian cricket, wherein, star power would trump on-field performance. On matchday though, Dhoni, the new captain, much newer to the international arena than Harbhajan himself, played Powar.

--------------------------------------------

Now, during this backlash after the Melbourne loss, Sehwag is the man that has been anointed by the media as savior of this Indian team that is taking on the mighty Australians in their own backyard. This is the very same Sehwag whom the whole world thought was getting a free ride in the Indian team just a year ago. Nothing much has changed. He made a comeback in the one dayers. Did not succeed. Some old failings showed up. And apparently, he has been in the same form in domestic cricket that Brian Charles Lara was in the ICL, without the record dollars per run scored though.

Ian Chappell had perfectly valid reasons for including Sehwag in the Indian playing eleven. India gives away too much in too many departments to the Aussies. So, in order for them to stand toe to toe with the Aussies consistently, they would need something special. His pick Sehwag, made a career out of playing special knocks until a couple of years ago. He hasn't done that in a long time though. So, picking him, as Ian made clear, would have been a gamble and nothing more.

Unfortunately, because of the fact that the negatives of our performance from the Melbourne test are theoretically solved by the solution, that is Sehwag, everyone appears to be taken up by it. A gamble was suddenly deemed crystal clear logic. Instead of weighing up skills, respective styles of batting was all that mattered in discussions and debates.

By the time the test match came about, I had taken it for granted that Sehwag was in and that Yuvraj would miss out. Much to my surprise, Kumble has selected an unchanged batting lineup. I suspect that the actual batting order might differ from Melbourne, though, I wouldn't be surprised if all we see is a change in attitude towards run scoring.

--------------------------------------------

One decision, one knock, one spell - these things don't mean much over an entire career. But a great career is something that has many of these 'ones'. Kumble and Dhoni have put up an excellent 'one' against their names with their respective decisions.